Reply to this topic
http://www.pbase.com/tim_in_ny/seton090410
0
Seton vs Elmira Notre Dame Football Photos
Started by tmrgrs, Sep 06 2010 03:16 PM
28 replies to this topic
#2 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 07 September 2010 - 09:08 PM
Seton Football equals one thing only - POWERHOUSE!
#3 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 08 September 2010 - 06:30 AM
Why would you make such a stupid post... SCC is trying to do better but I asure you no SCC kid or coach would post that ,they are waty smarter than this moron. POWERHOUSE IS A TEAM THAT PUMPS OUT WINS YEAR AFTER YEAR....
#4 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 08 September 2010 - 07:25 AM
QUOTE (Guest @ Sep 8 2010, 06:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why would you make such a stupid post... SCC is trying to do better but I asure you no SCC kid or coach would post that ,they are waty smarter than this moron. POWERHOUSE IS A TEAM THAT PUMPS OUT WINS YEAR AFTER YEAR....
No doubt, this is a student from another school making either a sarcastic comment or trying to make the school look like another infamous school on this board.
Go Saints!
#5 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
#6 Guest-Barney-*
-
- Guests
Posted 08 September 2010 - 09:52 AM
QUOTE (Guest @ Sep 8 2010, 07:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
No doubt, this is a student from another school making either a sarcastic comment or trying to make the school look like another infamous school on this board.
Go Saints!
Go Saints!
I agree - I have a friend who's son is on the Seton Football team, and he said that despite the win on Saturday over END, the parents, players and coaches know they need a lot of work, in all phases (offense, defense, special teams). So I doubt any Seton football player is talking smack.
#7 Guest-guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 09 September 2010 - 06:21 AM
No it is official. Seton = Powerhouse! We won our first game! There is a new era at Seton. New coaches and more wins!
#8 Guest-guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 10 September 2010 - 07:11 PM
We are in the process of building a "power house." It takes time. But we have everything we need to dominate our division and even compete and excell in upper division play. We will be there very soon!
#9 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 10 September 2010 - 08:21 PM
QUOTE (guest @ Sep 10 2010, 07:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We are in the process of building a "power house." It takes time. But we have everything we need to dominate our division and even compete and excell in upper division play. We will be there very soon!
SCC powerhouse just lost to mighty Oxford 15-7.......
#10 Guest-guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 10 September 2010 - 10:04 PM
Yeah, nice! Great job with that spread offense. You can keep that crap at Binghamton.
#11 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 06:07 AM
Todd Story just broght us the same old story! Losing to a pathetic Oxford team is pretty embarassing and humiliating to watch! Story and his cronies should have stayed the youth coach at Binghamton. He's out of his league even at this level.
#12 Guest-Baller-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 08:08 AM
QUOTE (Guest @ Sep 11 2010, 06:07 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Todd Story just broght us the same old story! Losing to a pathetic Oxford team is pretty embarassing and humiliating to watch! Story and his cronies should have stayed the youth coach at Binghamton. He's out of his league even at this level.
Story and the SCC staff are not out of their league, so stop making stupid remarks. You sound like some little redneck know-nothing who is real brave behind a computer, but never played a down of football.
Seton lost to Oxford due to the same problems that have plagued them for the last several years - lack of toughness in the line play, it is that simple. If anything, the blame should be placed totally on the prior coaches (Clarke and McManus), who were totally unfit and unqualified to run a football program. No teaching was provided to the Seton CC Football players, no weightlifting program, nothing that resembles 21st century football. It was disgraceful that Seton allowed that to happen (the powers in charge should be ashamed of themselves for doing this to the kids), and now the current staff (made up of guys who have played college football, Davis, Natale, Singleton, Pomeroy, Madison, and Story himself, and have spent time, effort and their own money at clinics, camps, and seminars) has to undue all the damage that the previous incompetents created, plus implement their program). Whether people want to admit it or not, SCC's coaching staff is exactly what that program needs IF they want to be successful in football (and successful means playing competitively with anyone in Class D, even Walton).
SCC has some good things going in their direction, and if they can get stronger in their line play, both physically and mentally (that is, they have to find some kids with chips on their should), they can be very competitive. A bona fide weightlifting program (which the SCC coaches are committed to) will be a great start.
#13 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 10:02 AM
Trust me I agree that the previous coaches never should have been here. But Wow! So this years crappy SCC team is last years coaches fault? Obviously YOU never played football! Obviously those clinics SU camps and weeknight lifting did not work out. Our coaches may be fatter but obviously these no name coaches are not that good at teaching what they learned in college. And the last time I checked there are 11 players on the field and you blame it all on the linemen? Sorry but it is more than that. Obviously we were not watching the same game! The spread offense crap is not going to work here!
#14 Guest-Thad-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 10:26 AM
Totally agree. We had something like a 150 total yards in the whole game and no first downs in the second half. And it's all the linemen's fault? I don't think so. If the spread offense is supposed to be that good and gather a ton of yards then Story obviously doesn't know how to run it! 3 completions? In a spread offense? Pathetic! Go back to youth coaching.
#15 Guest-RealPlayer-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 12:15 PM
QUOTE (Guest @ Sep 11 2010, 10:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Trust me I agree that the previous coaches never should have been here. But Wow! So this years crappy SCC team is last years coaches fault? Obviously YOU never played football! Obviously those clinics SU camps and weeknight lifting did not work out. Our coaches may be fatter but obviously these no name coaches are not that good at teaching what they learned in college. And the last time I checked there are 11 players on the field and you blame it all on the linemen? Sorry but it is more than that. Obviously we were not watching the same game! The spread offense crap is not going to work here!
Look, idiot, I played college football, and lettered all 4 years, including starting my last 3 years, so shut your stupid mouth. I forgot more about football than you will ever know.
I am not blaming the linemen. I am blaming the lame, incompetent pseudo-coaches that did not teach proper line play and fundemental to these linemen, let alone building them up physically with weight training and conditioning. It is not the kids fault, it is the worthless parasites that hamstrung the SCC program for years, and that includes the people who were in favor of keeping the likes of Clarke and McManus.
It is obvious you know nothing about football, but even worse, you aren't any good at reading comprehension. I will re-iterate (you probably don't what that means, but if you are able to read, you may understand a little) - the SCC players have had no instruction for several years, and this coaching staff is trying to undo the garbage that preceded them, as well as implement their program. The kids playing the offensive and defensive lines are not to be blamed for the lack of instruction (hindering their technique and fundementals) and physical development (which has hindered their strength and conditioning). And that is what line play is all about - technique, conditioning, and strength.
In fact, several of the SCC linemen have some real potential (can anyone imagine if Salamida and Clancy had some real coaches teaching them for four years, they would absolutely stand out, and even now they show signs here and there of what they can do, they have very good size and above average athletic ability). Also, Novinski (sorry about the spelling) is very aggressive and strong, and is the one guy on their lines that plays with a mean streak.
Furthermore, if you look at the players Seton is lining up, they are heavily relying on several sophomores (Harttrick, Pomeroy, Gosney, King, Regan, Kelleher), who are getting significant playing time. If these kids buy into the program (there's no reason they won't), SCC has a chance to be pretty decent.
Finally, do you think the spread offense is going to work right off the bat? It takes time to develop this, and the coaches believe they have players at the RB and WR position that can be factors if the QB can look downfield. Does anyone think Alex Newman can't play? He legitimately started at Binghamton. Tell me if Daly could get the ball to Newman or Trippicco, they couldn't make big plays for the offense. Line play for the spread vs. line play for a traditional offense is totally different, and it will take some time to develop the coordination needed by the line and QB to make it work.
Interestingly, you and others are trashing SCC's decision to use the spread, what would offense do you think they should run? And by the way, when SCC ran out of the I, Gaynor and Trippicco could barely get the handoff, the defense's penetration was too great. Anyway, I'd be interested to get your "Analysis" on how you would coach the SCC offense.
To summarize: it is not the linemen's fault for SCC's woeful offense. It's the linemen's lack of development that is at fault. And yes, last year's coach is responsible for last night's loss to Oxford. If you don't like it, that's your problem. It appears that the truth is bothersome to you.
#16 Guest-Guest-Chris-*-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 12:29 PM
QUOTE (RealPlayer @ Sep 11 2010, 12:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Look, idiot, I played college football, and lettered all 4 years, including starting my last 3 years, so shut your stupid mouth. I forgot more about football than you will ever know.
I am not blaming the linemen. I am blaming the lame, incompetent pseudo-coaches that did not teach proper line play and fundemental to these linemen, let alone building them up physically with weight training and conditioning. It is not the kids fault, it is the worthless parasites that hamstrung the SCC program for years, and that includes the people who were in favor of keeping the likes of Clarke and McManus.
It is obvious you know nothing about football, but even worse, you aren't any good at reading comprehension. I will re-iterate (you probably don't what that means, but if you are able to read, you may understand a little) - the SCC players have had no instruction for several years, and this coaching staff is trying to undo the garbage that preceded them, as well as implement their program. The kids playing the offensive and defensive lines are not to be blamed for the lack of instruction (hindering their technique and fundementals) and physical development (which has hindered their strength and conditioning). And that is what line play is all about - technique, conditioning, and strength.
In fact, several of the SCC linemen have some real potential (can anyone imagine if Salamida and Clancy had some real coaches teaching them for four years, they would absolutely stand out, and even now they show signs here and there of what they can do, they have very good size and above average athletic ability). Also, Novinski (sorry about the spelling) is very aggressive and strong, and is the one guy on their lines that plays with a mean streak.
Furthermore, if you look at the players Seton is lining up, they are heavily relying on several sophomores (Harttrick, Pomeroy, Gosney, King, Regan, Kelleher), who are getting significant playing time. If these kids buy into the program (there's no reason they won't), SCC has a chance to be pretty decent.
Finally, do you think the spread offense is going to work right off the bat? It takes time to develop this, and the coaches believe they have players at the RB and WR position that can be factors if the QB can look downfield. Does anyone think Alex Newman can't play? He legitimately started at Binghamton. Tell me if Daly could get the ball to Newman or Trippicco, they couldn't make big plays for the offense. Line play for the spread vs. line play for a traditional offense is totally different, and it will take some time to develop the coordination needed by the line and QB to make it work.
Interestingly, you and others are trashing SCC's decision to use the spread, what would offense do you think they should run? And by the way, when SCC ran out of the I, Gaynor and Trippicco could barely get the handoff, the defense's penetration was too great. Anyway, I'd be interested to get your "Analysis" on how you would coach the SCC offense.
To summarize: it is not the linemen's fault for SCC's woeful offense. It's the linemen's lack of development that is at fault. And yes, last year's coach is responsible for last night's loss to Oxford. If you don't like it, that's your problem. It appears that the truth is bothersome to you.
I am not blaming the linemen. I am blaming the lame, incompetent pseudo-coaches that did not teach proper line play and fundemental to these linemen, let alone building them up physically with weight training and conditioning. It is not the kids fault, it is the worthless parasites that hamstrung the SCC program for years, and that includes the people who were in favor of keeping the likes of Clarke and McManus.
It is obvious you know nothing about football, but even worse, you aren't any good at reading comprehension. I will re-iterate (you probably don't what that means, but if you are able to read, you may understand a little) - the SCC players have had no instruction for several years, and this coaching staff is trying to undo the garbage that preceded them, as well as implement their program. The kids playing the offensive and defensive lines are not to be blamed for the lack of instruction (hindering their technique and fundementals) and physical development (which has hindered their strength and conditioning). And that is what line play is all about - technique, conditioning, and strength.
In fact, several of the SCC linemen have some real potential (can anyone imagine if Salamida and Clancy had some real coaches teaching them for four years, they would absolutely stand out, and even now they show signs here and there of what they can do, they have very good size and above average athletic ability). Also, Novinski (sorry about the spelling) is very aggressive and strong, and is the one guy on their lines that plays with a mean streak.
Furthermore, if you look at the players Seton is lining up, they are heavily relying on several sophomores (Harttrick, Pomeroy, Gosney, King, Regan, Kelleher), who are getting significant playing time. If these kids buy into the program (there's no reason they won't), SCC has a chance to be pretty decent.
Finally, do you think the spread offense is going to work right off the bat? It takes time to develop this, and the coaches believe they have players at the RB and WR position that can be factors if the QB can look downfield. Does anyone think Alex Newman can't play? He legitimately started at Binghamton. Tell me if Daly could get the ball to Newman or Trippicco, they couldn't make big plays for the offense. Line play for the spread vs. line play for a traditional offense is totally different, and it will take some time to develop the coordination needed by the line and QB to make it work.
Interestingly, you and others are trashing SCC's decision to use the spread, what would offense do you think they should run? And by the way, when SCC ran out of the I, Gaynor and Trippicco could barely get the handoff, the defense's penetration was too great. Anyway, I'd be interested to get your "Analysis" on how you would coach the SCC offense.
To summarize: it is not the linemen's fault for SCC's woeful offense. It's the linemen's lack of development that is at fault. And yes, last year's coach is responsible for last night's loss to Oxford. If you don't like it, that's your problem. It appears that the truth is bothersome to you.
Wow! By the sounds of it this must be one of our coaches...sounds like we struck a cord! Last time I checked coaches take responsibility for their losses. But you pass it on to the previous coaching staff. Wow! Talk about lack of coaching. I guess all the hope we have left is that you coaches might as well start by sharing with your players some of the steriods you guys have been injecting into your overblown bellies!
I thought we got all these new recruits from binghamton and elsewhere and what have they brought...same results! We continue to lose to backwoods rednecks from oxford! Pretty sad by any measure! But you guys just keep call for more time and blame it on previous coaches despite lifting our boys all summer taking them to camps and clinics and asking us to drive all over the place for games. It is embarrassing. Story, the thinnest of the bunch is no head coach anyways.
#17 Guest-Guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 12:45 PM
OMG! Who really cares about SCC football? What's next we're going to start threads discussing the thriving economy of Panama? Talk about absolute irrelovence that no one pays any attention to let alone cares. LOL!
#18 Guest-Kramer-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 01:30 PM
QUOTE (Guest-Chris-* @ Sep 11 2010, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow! By the sounds of it this must be one of our coaches...sounds like we struck a cord! Last time I checked coaches take responsibility for their losses. But you pass it on to the previous coaching staff. Wow! Talk about lack of coaching. I guess all the hope we have left is that you coaches might as well start by sharing with your players some of the steriods you guys have been injecting into your overblown bellies!
I thought we got all these new recruits from binghamton and elsewhere and what have they brought...same results! We continue to lose to backwoods rednecks from oxford! Pretty sad by any measure! But you guys just keep call for more time and blame it on previous coaches despite lifting our boys all summer taking them to camps and clinics and asking us to drive all over the place for games. It is embarrassing. Story, the thinnest of the bunch is no head coach anyways.
I thought we got all these new recruits from binghamton and elsewhere and what have they brought...same results! We continue to lose to backwoods rednecks from oxford! Pretty sad by any measure! But you guys just keep call for more time and blame it on previous coaches despite lifting our boys all summer taking them to camps and clinics and asking us to drive all over the place for games. It is embarrassing. Story, the thinnest of the bunch is no head coach anyways.
You must be a loser dad, and your kid should be embarrassed by you.
You don't know if that's a coach or not, you're just guessing... why don't you go make your fat statements to the coaches in person... those "fat" men accomplished more than you ever did on a football field, look it up.
I have an idea, bro... don't take your kid to weightlifting, or football camp, or conditioning, and just have him do things your way so that you don't inconvenience yourself driving your kid around ... like you know more about football than Davis or Natale... hey, buddy, have your kid lift with you, those 12 ouncers, that will get him to be a great football player, at least in your opinion.
Story works hard, why don't you help him out, instead of ragging on him... you must be the typical parent who's kid is not dedicated, doesn't want to commit to being a really good player, but because you pay tuition, you feel he should get playing time, right? So what if he drags the other players down to his level, your son doesn't have to be in shape, not be strong, have no feel for the game, and hit like a candy. And by all means, never should a coach yell at the kids... that's why the coaches that your ripping were actually good players (in high school and college), they had balls and guts.
go play soccer, fool... you're kind only drags down a squad... if it's that embarrassing, don't be in their program, they won't miss an a*****e like you...
#19 Guest-SetonDad-*
-
- Guests
Posted 11 September 2010 - 07:27 PM
QUOTE (Guest-Chris-* @ Sep 11 2010, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow! By the sounds of it this must be one of our coaches...sounds like we struck a cord! Last time I checked coaches take responsibility for their losses. But you pass it on to the previous coaching staff. Wow! Talk about lack of coaching. I guess all the hope we have left is that you coaches might as well start by sharing with your players some of the steriods you guys have been injecting into your overblown bellies!
I thought we got all these new recruits from binghamton and elsewhere and what have they brought...same results! We continue to lose to backwoods rednecks from oxford! Pretty sad by any measure! But you guys just keep call for more time and blame it on previous coaches despite lifting our boys all summer taking them to camps and clinics and asking us to drive all over the place for games. It is embarrassing. Story, the thinnest of the bunch is no head coach anyways.
I thought we got all these new recruits from binghamton and elsewhere and what have they brought...same results! We continue to lose to backwoods rednecks from oxford! Pretty sad by any measure! But you guys just keep call for more time and blame it on previous coaches despite lifting our boys all summer taking them to camps and clinics and asking us to drive all over the place for games. It is embarrassing. Story, the thinnest of the bunch is no head coach anyways.
This ain't no coach, but I'll tell ya, Seton kids is soft (not the new kids), prolly because of parents like you, don't wanna have sonny boy yelled at, not pushed to be better, nothing but easy livin'...
I saw the old Seton coaches, they sucked, never got the players ready to play real football, a joke... better get more Binghamton boys, you need 'em, don't be hatin' on the new coaches they played and could ball real good... I played against some of new Seton coaches... Natale, Davis, they know what is up...you suck... up your's jack...
#20 Guest-guest-*
-
- Guests
Posted 12 September 2010 - 02:19 AM
This is really like two retards fighting over to see who the biggest retard is. No one cares about SCC football. We're a basketball school and that's about it. No one cares about SCC football or our coaches. Regardless, coaches, stop making excuses and just own it. You got outcoached by backwoodsmen!
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
